Massive Hole Blown In COVID Narrative After NY Times Makes Shock Confession

We’ve all been told that natural immunity is not good enough and won’t protect us from COVID.

That means masks, social distancing, lockdowns, and vaccines.

All supposedly for our own good and enforced by federal, state, and local governments.

Turns out it’s not quite so simple.

Based on a new report by the New York Times, it appears very likely the national media is ready to concede what scientists have known for a long time. People who have been naturally infected with coronavirus have natural immunity that will likely last for years, and maybe forever.

Daily Veracity

The NY Times, along with the rest of the mainstream media, chose to keep this information from the American people.

They told us lockdowns, vaccines, masks, and all the rest of it were necessary for our safety.

This new information casts doubt on all of that.

But their method of revealing it is suspicious too, because they had two versions of it.

It is extremely odd though that the newer version of the New York Times article claims that “Immunity to the coronavirus lasts at least a year, possibly a lifetime, improving over time especially after vaccination,” while the main study their article references says nothing about vaccination and focuses exclusively on natural infection in the abstract. The older version of the article does not contain this manner of references to vaccination at all.

Daily Veracity

The science that liberals say they believe in doesn’t get quite the same appreciation if it poses inconvenient questions.

Such as:

…if you have a less than 1% chance of dying from COVID-19, lasting and more robust immunity from natural infection, and an extremely low chance of having a serious reaction especially if you have high vitamin D, then why would you need to take the vaccine at all?

More salient, if the CDC’s own vaccine adverse event reporting system, VAERS, historically only reports 1% of actual adverse events, but yet shows hundreds of thousands already, why would anyone even consider vaccination to begin with?

Daily Veracity

Will the NY Times address these questions?

Almost certainly not, unless they dismiss them as conspiracy theories.

But why did the NY Times publish what amounts to a confession at this precise moment?

We’re left to draw our own conclusions.

The NY Times has just shown they’ve been hiding something very important from you all this time, and their choice to reveal it now can only be deliberate.

So the bottom line is that you can’t trust anything that Democrats, Government officials, or the liberal media say about COVID.

1 comment
  1. The COMPETENCE and CONFIDENCE of NYT reporting has reached a NEW LOW. BIAS and IDEOLOGY seem to be the prime drivers of the underlying concept of nearly everything they report, beyond the weather forecast and numeric sports scores!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



You May Also Like

Trump TEARS DOWN ‘Crazy Nancy’

President Donald Trump tore into House Speaker Nancy Pelosi right before setting…

Trump BASHES Pelosi Comment

President Donald Trump returned fire after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made some…

Shady Schiff Suggests Barr Is ‘Dangerous’

Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff is fuming at Attorney General William Barr and…

Pelosi THRASHED For This Decision

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is being taken to task by New York…